So back to why I haven’t blogged in a bit…Well what with moving back to Mauritius and doing most of my research for my dissertation “The Professionalization of PR in Mauritius”. And to top it all, I landed myself a job, yes!!! I did it. I am now the Communications Officer at Harel Mallac and Co Ltd www.harelmallac.com, which is one of the most prestigious firms in the private sector of Mauritius situated in the Capital City, Port Louis.

So between all of this, I barely had a minute to myself. However now that I have some time, thought I’d drop in .  So far so good, the job seems quite promising, I like my duties so far and have some pretty exciting projects lined up…Hopefully, it will all go well…

That’s all for now my PR peeps…Ill be back soon…

I will keep on blogging, but will now talk and discuss about issues that I find interesting in the PR world or interesting PR facts.

Stay posted..there’s more to come…

The reason I am talking about Clifford is because in class last week we watched one of Louis Theroux’s “Weird Weekend” documentaries and it was the one where he met Max Clifford.

And when I watched this documentary, the “Iam the boss” side of Mr. Clifford definitely came out first, along with the lies, the spins and the unethical conversations.

Louis Theroux though as wacky as usual was brilliant, funny and did match up to the notorious Mr. Clifford.

But Mr. Clifford, as unethical as he may be, is also brilliant and if I needed to make it big, celebrity wise and of course had the money,[ that Max Clifford always keeps bringing up...yes the minimum is £10,000] I would go to him.

Non-governmental organization (NGO) is a term that has become widely accepted as referring to a legally constituted, non-governmental organization created by natural or legal persons with no participation or representation of any government. In the cases in which NGOs are funded totally or partially by governments, the NGO maintains its non-governmental status and excludes government representatives from membership in the organization. Unlike the term intergovernmental organization, “non-governmental organization” is a term in general use but is not a legal definition. In many jurisdictions these types of organization are defined as “civil society organizations” or referred to by other names.

What is there purpose? NGOs vary in their methods. Some act primarily as lobbyists, while others primarily conduct programs and activities. For instance, an NGO such as Oxfam, concerned with poverty alleviation, might provide needy people with the equipment and skills to find food and clean drinking water, whereas an NGO like the FFDA helps through investigation and documentation of human rights violations and provides legal assistance to victims of human rights abuses. Others, such as Afghanistan Information Management Services, provide specialized technical products and services to support development activities implemented on the ground by other organizations.

What we must note, is that PR is essential in NGOs, from any sector, because Non-governmental organizations need healthy relationships with the public to meet their goals. Foundations and charities use sophisticated public relations campaigns to raise funds and employ standard lobbying techniques with governments. Interest groups may be of political importance because of their ability to influence social and political outcomes. The PR essence is needed and definitely used, but however, NGO workers do not like to associate with PR, in fact they deny everything about PR.

It’s all a big irony if you ask me because,  the guest speaker this week from Friends of the Earth called himself the brand destroyer, yes his job is to destroy big brands. Because according to him that’s what NGOs do: they destroy or threaten to destroy the reputation of big brands in order to get their way – in other words impose their ideas on the big companies to get what they want, now normally its theirs cause, but they can go to extremes to get people to click on the “donate now” button as well. Is this all transparent or are there vested interests involved? But the question is how do people from NGOs who deny any PR connection know how to defend their causes if the do not have the skills required, and by that I mean, PR skills…worth thinking about I think…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non governmental_organization#Public_relations

As my previous post might suggest the debate this week in class was about politics and PR. The debate in class was very interesting and by far the best one we had during this term. The statement was as follows: “Political PR has undermined public trust in politicians and is the single biggest threat to our democratic health.”

While one side of the team focused on an ethical perspective, for the statement, the other side had a more pluralist view against the statement, with a more idealistic opinion, yes but also a realistic one, in that a statement couldn’t judge any sector and political PR couldn’t be condemned just because its reputation precedes it.

The market is wide, and we have options, they argued, while the other side were adamant, political PR is ruining society.

I disagree; ruthless politicians might ruin society, not PR practitioners. Through my past posts I have maintained my belief in our PR industry and its capacity to be ethical and do the right thing, or be professional. I might not have practiced in the political arena yet, but I believe that PR can help any sector that requires it. As for political PR it is utterly important, and the pluralist view that my friends defended quite effectively in class proves to show that diversity, in any sector is healthy and individuals must make their own choices. Political PR is becoming more transparent and is for the public’s interest.

Political communication has grown from its humble beginnings in the 19^th Century to its grand role in contemporary politics.  Understanding the foundations of the practice of public relations is key to the history of public relations in politics.  Public relations scholar Scott Cutlip’s book Public Relations History is a detailed history of public relations practice dating back to the formation of the country of the United States of America.  Cutlip provides a working frame of reference regarding the emergence of public relations practice in politics.  Beginning in the late 19^th Century. Cutlip identifies the systemic organization of communication tactics in Presidential campaigns.  Aide to President Grover Cleveland George F. Parker is identified as a crucial figure in the early practice of public relations in politics.  In the 1892 Presidential campaign Parker helped Cleveland combat negative newspaper attention by distributing copies of Cleveland speeches in advance to newspapers, a practice that laid the foundation for a long-term campaign for the candidate.

The 1896 Presidential campaign saw the first organization of publicity and campaign management.  Both the Republican and Democratic parties organized their campaign headquarters, national speaking tours and produced written pamphlets meant to ‘educate’ voters.  The McKinley also used the American flag as a symbol for the image of the campaign. This practice by the Republican Party has continued into the present.  The campaign of the Democratic candidate William Jennings Bryant was unable to match the Republicans efforts of publishing campaign literature.  The ensuing Republican victory made clear the importance of the new publicity and campaign management tactics.  Following his victory, President William McKinley, continued to monitor newspapers during his presidency.  Print media dominated political campaigns until the advent of radio (1928) and television (1952).

Former Clinton administration communications official Sidney Blumenthal’s book The Permanent Campaign argues the importance of communication consultants in political campaigns and offers a history of important consultants.  The chapter “The interpretation of American dreams” is a look at the early public relations practitioner Edward Bernays.  Blumenthal states that despite the advent of modern public relations strategy and tactics it was Bernays who provided the original foundation for all public relations practice in politics.  Bernays is credited with formulating the ‘engineering of consent’, a key social doctrine used to determine audience understanding and desire.  In general, Blumenthal credits Bernays with legitimizing the vital role of the public relations consultant in a political campaign.

prtalkingpoints.files.wordpress.com/…/public-relations-and-politics.doc

03.09.2010 – B.M.P.R Ltd (Business Media Public Relations) has launched today a new creative and innovative webcast to portray the merits of social media and its benefits to any business.

Indeed, Social Media – Welcome to the Revolution webcast can be described as a very comprehensive and easy to understand initiative of the firm to promote social media to its portfolio of clients and encourage them to use this fascinating new medium of communication, media management and relationship building.

The video is filled with tips on how to use social media and how it can boost your business.
The video goes indepth in the meanings behind social media, its sociological and cultural aspects and its benefits as well as some drawbacks and how to overtake them.

Monali Radhakissoon, Client Social Media Strategist at BMPR Ltd and creator and producer of the webcast said: ” This webcast is yet another innovative opportunity for us to demonstrate the benefits of social media and explain the concept to our clients in an informal way, where we can be sure they understand our points”.

The webcast was created and shooted by the PR team headed by Monali who did a lot of research into the subject, aiming at targeting the right audience, in the easiest way possible.

According to Julia Stiles, Director of PR at B.M.P.R Ltd, “Social media is about people, people from different cultures and backgrounds, communicating in a public sphere. Social networks are defined by the people within them. In turn, each network flourishes as its own island, and over time, a somewhat impenetrable culture emerges – which helps to insure a more meaningful and commercial-free experience among its residents. Transparent and genuine participation is now a very effective PR tool”.

The bottom line is that we have to understand the sociology of social networks before we can either write them off as a useless tool or more importantly, participate in them.

Even if social media has shortcomings, today, conversations are markets and markets are conversations. And the forums for these conversation cultivate a tight, unswerving and mostly unforgiving community and culture. Participation requires observation in order to understand the the sociological landscape and the dynamics that define each community. They are after all, populated by people, not audiences.

The difference is that by listening, reading, and participating, PR will be smarter and more approachable than ever before. This is how we humanize brands, create loyalty, and earn customer’s trust.

The webcast is available on B.M.P.R Ltd’s blog,its YouTube channel,Facebook,Twitter and Digg

Contact:

B.M.P.R Ltd -

22, Soho Square
London, NW1 HS3

Phone:: 02084820041   Fax: 02084820042

There are increasing concerns among critics and PR practitioners over whether a large number of women in PR is unhealthy for the field. Many believe that a workplace dominated by women does not function as well as a workplace with representatives of both genders could have functioned. There have been a number of suggestions for tackling this issue, i.e. attracting more men into the industry. Some feel harsh measures are needed, like offering men higher salaries than women for doing the same job, or hiring a less-qualified man over a more qualified woman. Others propose implementing special programmes, such as internships or developmental assignments, to bring men into the profession, as well as attracting more male students to the PR educational courses.

Personally I think balance is important in every field, and both men and women can bring different aspects into the working environment. But I do not believe large numbers of women are a serious threat to the successful functioning of the PR field. If women posses good traits for the profession, then why should not they be doing a job which suits them best and which they feel comfortable in? At the same time, I still feel the industry should not abandon its efforts to lure more men, as long as these efforts do not include extreme methods like positive discrimination. The PR field might learn from the examples of successful efforts of other industries, like medicine, law and business, where women used to be severely underrepresented, to bring more of them in, and apply these strategies to attract men.

As about prejudices against female workers, it is a shame if some employers or clients still feel that hiring a male representative would equal a job better done, but I feel this attitude is already shifting as time goes by, so I do not think it seriously harms the perception of the PR field. After all, as long as organisations and people need PR services, they will use these services… And as we all know, PR is now more in demand than ever!

Recently, there’s been a lot of discussion about the growing majority of women in public relations.The gender imbalance can be seen as very unhealthy for the industry. Why are men reluctant to join the PR industry. Is it because it is viewed as a feminine industry, or the “pink ghetto” as many call it.

The truth is, women have been “the new majority” in PR for a decade. We dominate on both the agency and the corporate sides. Everywhere, that is, but at the top. That fact, rather than the idea that men might be scared away from PR, is what is a real issue. (NYICI*)

The debate last week was centered around women in PR and how they would or would never make it to the top. When I look around in my class, I see women, a room full of women with only four men.

While some of the debaters argued that women would never make it to the top, others were adamant that women would reach the top.  And why not? Just yesterday Kathryn Bigelow made history by becoming the first woman to win the best director Oscar, in a male dominated sector. If this only just happened, then women in PR have a fair chance of reaching the top.

The excuses to explain the position of women are many, for example, family and motherhood or colleagues opine that we women are so busy making our clients and superiors look good that we don’t promote ourselves. Or, that many don’t really want the responsiblity of being CEO. Others blame it on clients, claiming they’re not that comfortable with a female chief.

There might be women who think along those lines, but a majority of us are up to the challenge.

Some say we are getting there. They point to Marcia Silverman, who served as CEO of Ogilvy PR for seven years .At the largest firms, there’s APCO’s Margery Kraus, Donna Imperato (Cohn & Wolfe), and Barby Siegel, who recently took the CEO post at Zeno. Melissa Wagener Zorkin, Jen Prosek  and Laura Tomasetti are CEOs of significant firms as well. But, they, in addition to Kraus, are entrepreneurs who built their own firms.(NYICI*)

So what are the real reasons behind women not reaching the top? If there are always dicussions about the feminization of PR, then clearly there is a problem. What is the solution?

Is the next generation of PR practitioners to be, including me, make the change. I for one, will not stop till I reach the top and I firmly believe women can and will make it to the top.

Happy Women’s Day…

* http://www.nywici.org/features/blogs/aloud/feminization-pr-why-aren%E2%80%99t-more-women-top